
The saga of Iggy and Ellen
I’m sure everyone knows by now of the Ellen DeGeneres drama. She adopted Iggy, a Brussels griffon mix, from Mutts and Moms animal adoption agency. When the puppy couldn’t get along with her cats (even after a pet trainer was brought in), she “rehomed” the dog, giving it to her hairdresser’s family. Giving Iggy away to another home was a violation of Mutts and Moms’ rules of adoption. Apparently, DeGeneres and her partner, Portia de Rossi, didn’t realize that when they adopted Iggy. The dog was taken from her hairdresser’s family by the adoption agency and has since been placed in another home.
Is there more to this whole story than is being told to us? From the photos I’ve seen, the dog was small enough and I’m sure DeGeneres’ home is large enough, couldn’t she just keep the dog and cats separated? Doesn’t she have the staff to keep an eye on the situation? In my experience, the dog matures and learns to leave the cats alone and the cats learn to tolerate the dog. (And I never had to bring in a pet trainer, especially one who wasn’t successful at getting the “lions” to lay down with the Iggy.) With all the resources DeGeneres must have, couldn’t she make this situation work if she really wanted the dog?
It also raises the issue of adoption agencies and their rules and regulations. Agencies have to have some standards for adoption, but common sense and the best thing for the animal should rule. And maybe Mutts and Moms did the best thing in this case for Iggy, but sometimes it seems that a few people with animal rescue organizations have control issues that have nothing to do with adopting an animal.
I guess the lesson learned out of all the controversy is an old one that bears repeating and dogs us time and time again: Read the fine print.
I highly disapprove of Mutts and Moms, Marina Batkis and Vanessa Chekroun’s actions. They acted on impulse with vengeance on the goodhearted-ness and best interest between a celebrity and deserving children; not with empathy or forethought. In researching the web, PETA, Humane Society, BBB, and SPCA historical information, these owners have not proven themselves respectful or caring. In fact they show spite, more than anything. Reviewing everything to date re. Marina. She still doesn’t show any emotion for the human bond between animal and a well deserving family. A reasonable human would not act on impulse driven by a bogus contract but allowed time for review and reasses the situation. A responsible business owner would have responded by now to the media, attorneys, and press with a RESOLUTION and not hiding and REACTING with negativity. When one appears as a villain one would naturally want to disarm the situation; not in this case. Nothing on the news has touched me in such a way that i would be actually reaching out and being an activist.
This is Marina’s quote: “Celebrities you know, they, they get preferential treatment. They have lots of money. They go into a restaurant they get a table.”
Look close at her glasses >. I try not to be judgemental but something doesn’t seem right.